People & Leadership · Human Resource Management

PIPAuthoring — A Fair PIP and How to Run the Conversation

Design a Performance Improvement Plan that is fair if the report succeeds, legally sound if they do not, and humane either way.

4 rounds Executive English, Español
All simulations Get started
Preview

About this simulation

Design a Performance Improvement Plan that is fair if the report succeeds, legally sound if they do not, and humane either way. Across four rounds you will involve HR, write specific measurable criteria, run the PIP conversation, and design the operating cadence — building a Fairness, Legal Defensibility, and Humanity score profile.

Who it is for

An advanced simulation for participants used to working with the main frameworks and trade-offs of the subject, designed for executive education and experienced professionals.

How a session runs

  1. The instructor creates a session from the Eureka dashboard and invites the participants.
  2. Participants play 4 rounds. In each one they submit their decisions and the simulation calculates the results.
  3. The simulation can be run in English, Español.
  4. The instructor follows each participant's progress and results from the dashboard, and uses the class results for the debrief.

Decisions participants make

The decisions participants make during the simulation:

  • Who do you call first?
  • PIP duration
  • HR involvement cadence
  • Number of improvement criteria
  • Criteria style
  • Evidence base for the gap
  • Support package included
  • Consequences stated in the document
  • How will you deliver the PIP?
  • Opening sentence

Subjects covered

Designed for courses in Human Resource Management.

See all People & Leadership simulations →

Ready to use PIPAuthoring — A Fair PIP and How to Run the Conversation with your students?

Contact us and we'll set you up with a free trial session.

Contact us