Marketing & Sales · Brand & Product Management

Trust by Design — Launch Demir Asistan Without Breaking Brand Trust

A four-round, advanced brand-management simulation set inside Demir Bank A.Ş., a mid-size Istanbul retail bank (4.2M customers, 310 branches, net banking revenue ₺38.5 billion) whose decade-long franchise rests on a published Brand Trust Index of 74/100 — the highest in its peer set against a sector median of 61.

4 rounds Executive English, Español

Preview

About this simulation

A four-round, advanced brand-management simulation set inside Demir Bank A.Ş., a mid-size Istanbul retail bank (4.2M customers, 310 branches, net banking revenue ₺38.5 billion) whose decade-long franchise rests on a published Brand Trust Index of 74/100 — the highest in its peer set against a sector median of 61.

On 9 June 2026 the COO mandates the six-week launch of 'Demir Asistan', a generative-AI assistant inside the mobile app, ahead of the Q3 earnings call. Finance has banked ₺310 million in annual savings on a 55% AI-containment target; every 10 points of lost containment costs ≈ ₺56 million.

But the bank's own pre-test mirrors the published research (Lefkeli, Karataş & Gürhan-Canli, IJRM 2024): when customers learn they are sharing with AI rather than a human, brand trust drops sharply — driven by an inference that their data reaches a far larger audience and a resulting sense of exploitation — and the drop roughly doubles among the privacy-concerned 38% who hold 56% of deposits.

A naïve 'AI-first, covert, full-data' design cuts the Index 9 points (74→65). KVKK Law No. 6698 demands a lawful basis and explicit consent; a consumer-affairs journalist has filed an information request, and a covert launch breaks as a reputation story during the earnings call.

Playing the Brand Manager on a fixed ₺4.0 million build budget, you (1) diagnose WHY trust falls — separating audience-size inference and the sense of exploitation from generic 'AI is creepy'; (2) configure the trust architecture across disclosure, confidentiality assurance, anthropomorphism and data-use scope with a defensible KVKK consent flow; (3) set a segmented human-fallback rule under a viral 'tone-deaf bot' incident, balancing containment savings against trust; and (4) defend the numbers to the COO and a Board member and commit a monitoring + recovery plan if trust slips below the 70 floor.

The math rewards the three evidence-based mitigations (confidentiality assurance, anthropomorphism, data minimisation) and segmented fallback, and punishes the five classic errors — covert launch, cosmetic avatar, over-correction that misses savings, empty confidentiality promises that breach KVKK, and a one-size fallback that routes fraud and hardship to the bot.

Final KPIs track Brand Trust Index, AI-Containment %, Perceived-Exploitation score, and Annual Savings against the ₺310M target.

Who it is for

An advanced simulation for participants used to working with the main frameworks and trade-offs of the subject, designed for executive education and experienced professionals.

How a session runs

  1. The instructor creates a session from the Eureka dashboard and invites the participants.
  2. Participants play 4 rounds. In each one they submit their decisions and the simulation calculates the results.
  3. The simulation can be run in English, Español.
  4. The instructor follows each participant's progress and results from the dashboard, and uses the class results for the debrief.

Decisions participants make

The decisions participants make during the simulation:

  • Your pre-test says trust falls when customers share with AI. What is the real mechanism?
  • Which customers are most exposed to the trust drop?
  • Which contact types carry the highest trust cost if routed to AI first?
  • How candidly does your team name the mechanism instead of "add a friendly bot"? (%)
  • Disclosure — how do customers learn they are talking to AI?
  • Confidentiality assurance — what do you guarantee on screen?
  • Anthropomorphism — what persona does the assistant wear?
  • Data-use scope — what does the assistant ingest, and under what consent?
  • Human-fallback rule — when does the assistant hand off to a person?
  • How visible is the "talk to a human" option?

What participants track

What participants follow on screen as the rounds go by:

  • Trust, Containment & Exploitation Trajectory

Subjects covered

Designed for courses in Brand & Product Management.

Ready to use Trust by Design — Launch Demir Asistan Without Breaking Brand Trust with your students?

Contact us and we'll set you up with a free trial session.

Contact us