Marketing & Sales · Sales & Go-To-Market

The Key Account Gambit — Liant Composants' Portfolio Defence

A four-round, advanced B2B Key Account Management simulation set inside Liant Composants, a EUR 72M French industrial-fastening SME near Lyon (28% gross margin, 180 active B2B accounts, just 6 strategic account managers, the top 10 accounts producing 62% of revenue).

4 rounds Executive English, Español

Preview

About this simulation

A four-round, advanced B2B Key Account Management simulation set inside Liant Composants, a EUR 72M French industrial-fastening SME near Lyon (28% gross margin, 180 active B2B accounts, just 6 strategic account managers, the top 10 accounts producing 62% of revenue).

On 11 June 2026 the anchor account — Aérospatiale Garonne, an aerospace OEM worth 18% of revenue (EUR 13M/yr) — issues an ultimatum: a 9% price cut plus a dedicated on-site engineer, or it dual-sources 40% of its volume to a German rival within the quarter. Playing the new Commercial Director, you must defend the portfolio without bleeding it dry, working a fixed EUR 1.5M commercial budget that cannot grow this year.

Round 1 — Read the Portfolio: discover that revenue is a misleading lens, surface the 40 small accounts that lose EUR 1.1M/yr and the 22 under-served high-margin mid-tier accounts (EUR 9.5M), and compute true profitability (margin minus cost-to-serve) once you can see that 55% of KAM time is trapped on the top 3.

Round 2 — Allocate Effort & Set Service Levels: reallocate the 6 KAMs across segments and design differentiated service tiers — moving small accounts to self-serve to recover the leak while funding a higher tier for high-potential mid-tier accounts, all inside EUR 1.5M.

Round 3 — Choose the AI Tool & Defend the Anchor: deploy ONE of three AI modules (churn prediction, account scoring, next-best-action) on data that needs EUR 90k of cleanup, and answer the 9% ultimatum — a volume-tied discount, a total-cost-of-ownership value reframe, selective concessions, a blunt across-the-board cut, or a graceful partial walk-away keeping the profitable 60%.

Round 4 — Recover & Set the Operating Rhythm: report the four KPIs versus the Round 1 baseline and lock in the new commercial model.

The math rewards value-and-potential prioritisation over revenue size, differentiated cost-to-serve, discounts that buy a commitment, focused single-module AI deployment, and growing share-of-wallet inside existing relationships — and measurably punishes the five classic errors: revenue-led effort allocation, uniform premium service, caving to a blanket 9% discount for nothing in return, switching on all three AI modules thinly, and chasing new logos while ~35% share-of-wallet sits untouched.

Final KPIs track Account Profitability (EUR M), Retention, Share-of-Wallet, and Cost-to-Serve.

Who it is for

An advanced simulation for participants used to working with the main frameworks and trade-offs of the subject, designed for executive education and experienced professionals.

How a session runs

  1. The instructor creates a session from the Eureka dashboard and invites the participants.
  2. Participants play 4 rounds. In each one they submit their decisions and the simulation calculates the results.
  3. The simulation can be run in English, Español.
  4. The instructor follows each participant's progress and results from the dashboard, and uses the class results for the debrief.

Decisions participants make

The decisions participants make during the simulation:

  • What lens do you use to read the 180-account book?
  • Do you build a cost-to-serve view before allocating any effort?
  • Write the one-line diagnosis of where effort is mis-spent.
  • Reallocate the 6 account managers' time across the segments (must total 100%).
  • Service tier for the 40 loss-making small accounts.
  • Service tier for the 22 high-potential mid-tier accounts.
  • Deploy ONE AI module well (the data only supports one this quarter).
  • Answer Aérospatiale's 9% cut + dedicated-engineer ultimatum.
  • Where do you find the revenue to replace the at-risk volume?
  • Set a credible target share-of-wallet for the top accounts (%). Baseline ~35%.

What participants track

What participants follow on screen as the rounds go by:

  • Four-KPI Trajectory vs Baseline

Subjects covered

Designed for courses in Sales & Go-To-Market.

Ready to use The Key Account Gambit — Liant Composants' Portfolio Defence with your students?

Contact us and we'll set you up with a free trial session.

Contact us