Sectores de actividad · Educación y pedagogía

Custom Build — Architect Summit Grid's Executive Programme

A four-round, advanced executive-education strategy simulation set inside Wasatch Executive Learning, the custom and open-enrolment unit of a top-30 U.S. business school in Salt Lake City (USD 14.2M revenue, 22% contribution-margin floor, 35 internal faculty, a 25-strong external bench at 1.5x day-rates).

4 rondas Ejecutivo English, Español
Todas las simulaciones Empezar
Vista previa

Sobre la simulación

A four-round, advanced executive-education strategy simulation set inside Wasatch Executive Learning, the custom and open-enrolment unit of a top-30 U.S. business school in Salt Lake City (USD 14.2M revenue, 22% contribution-margin floor, 35 internal faculty, a 25-strong external bench at 1.5x day-rates).

On 2 March 2026, Summit Grid Utilities — a USD 6.4B regional energy company and your largest prospective anchor client — issues an RFP for a custom leadership programme for 220 mid-level operations managers leading a grid-modernisation and decarbonisation transition. The ask says 'leadership training'; the client's own engagement-survey data says unclear decision rights and weak cross-functional coordination.

The constraints bite: a hard USD 1.8M budget ceiling (about USD 8,180 per participant, ~26% below Wasatch's typical USD 11,000 custom blended price), a signed blueprint due in 18 days and the first cohort live in 90, only 2 of 35 academics with energy-transition depth (both committed through Q2), and a Kirkpatrick Level 3-4 impact commitment that is auditable and reputationally expensive to miss.

This is a bake-off against two rivals for a 3-year, ~USD 6M preferred-provider master agreement.

Playing the Executive-Education Director you (1) separate the presenting request from the demonstrated capability gap and commit to honest Level 3-4 measures; (2) architect the blueprint — objectives, format mix across in-person, live-virtual and blended-with-digital, cohort waves, and the transfer mechanism that earns the Level 3 promise; (3) allocate the scarce faculty pool against the USD 1.8M ceiling, build the engagement P&L and decide go / scale / no-go; and (4) pitch and defend needs-alignment, projected impact, delivery feasibility and the renewal logic to a sceptical COO and CHRO.

The math rewards a diagnosed, transfer-designed, deliberately-margined, feasible bid and punishes the five classic errors — designing to the request not the gap, format-by-default, margin blindness, an impact promise with no transfer mechanism, and an over-engineered blueprint that misses the 18-day deadline.

Final KPIs track Needs Alignment, Impact Credibility, Contribution Margin % and budget committed against the USD 1.8M cap.

Para quién es

Una simulación avanzada para participantes acostumbrados a trabajar con los principales marcos y dilemas de la materia, pensada para formación de directivos y profesionales con experiencia.

Cómo funciona una sesión

  1. El docente crea una sesión desde el panel de Eureka e invita a los participantes.
  2. Los participantes juegan 4 rondas. En cada una envían sus decisiones y la simulación calcula los resultados.
  3. La simulación se puede jugar en: English, Español.
  4. El docente sigue el progreso y los resultados de cada participante desde el panel, y usa los resultados de la clase para el debriefing.

Decisiones que toman los participantes

Las decisiones que toman los participantes durante la simulación:

  • Summit says "leadership training." What is the real capability gap the data shows?
  • Map the dominant root cause. Which part is genuinely an education problem?
  • Which Level 3–4 success measures will you commit to in the impact dossier?
  • How rigorously does your team interrogate the survey evidence before designing? (%)
  • Choose the format mix for 220 managers — weigh transfer-of-learning AND the ceiling
  • Transfer mechanism — what forces learning to reach Level 3 on the job?
  • Cohort structure across the 90-day window
  • How many modules in the blueprint? (deeper ≠ better if it can't be built in 18 days)
  • Staff the energy-transition modules. Only 2 internal academics, both committed through Q2.
  • Pick ONE margin-protection lever that does NOT break the diagnosis

Qué siguen los participantes

Lo que los participantes siguen en pantalla a medida que avanzan las rondas:

  • Bid Quality Trajectory

Temas que cubre

Diseñada para asignaturas de Educación y pedagogía.

Ver todas las simulaciones de Sectores de actividad →

¿Quieres usar Custom Build — Architect Summit Grid's Executive Programme con tus estudiantes?

Escríbenos y te preparamos una sesión de prueba gratuita.

Contactar