Industry Verticals · Education & Pedagogy

The Custom Brief — Scope Téléphonie Méridien at Alpina Executive Learning

A four-round, intermediate executive-education scoping simulation set inside Alpina Executive Learning, the custom exec-ed unit of a mid-sized French business school in Grenoble (EUR 9.2M revenue, 22% contribution margin, ~34 programmes/year, two-thirds repeat business).

4 rounds MBA & Masters English, Español

Preview

About this simulation

A four-round, intermediate executive-education scoping simulation set inside Alpina Executive Learning, the custom exec-ed unit of a mid-sized French business school in Grenoble (EUR 9.2M revenue, 22% contribution margin, ~34 programmes/year, two-thirds repeat business).

On 8 June 2026 a EUR 480,000 RFP lands from Téléphonie Méridien, a 14,000-employee French telecom, for a leadership programme for 120 mid-level managers — Alpina's largest single opportunity of the year and a gateway to a multi-year framework agreement.

But the brief is contradictory: the HR sponsor wants transformational culture change, the COO who controls the budget wants measurable operational impact in six months, and the surveyed managers want practical, time-light learning. The school mandates a 20% contribution-margin floor, so deliverable cost cannot exceed EUR 384,000 — yet the first rough costing is EUR 430,000, a EUR 46,000 overrun.

Playing the Program Director, you (1) decode the brief and triangulate the three stakeholders into one fundable primary objective, anchoring on the COO's measurable-impact outcome while honouring the manager survey; (2) allocate the fixed EUR 90,000 design-and-development sub-budget across five modules — strategy, leading change, operational execution, coaching/360 and capstone — deciding where bespoke build earns its cost and where proven open modules do the job, without overspending the envelope; (3) set the open-vs-custom format mix (open substitution capped at 40% of contact hours) and close the EUR 46,000 margin gap with levers that protect the deliverable rather than gut it; and (4) pitch to the selection panel (COO + HR sponsor), price for the guaranteed 90 seats rather than the hoped-for 120, and commit to how six-month impact will be measured.

The scoring rewards stakeholder triangulation, portfolio-style design-budget allocation, a margin solve that preserves coaching and faculty, conservative fill assumptions and a relevance-led design — and measurably punishes the five classic errors: designing for the loudest stakeholder, bespoke-everything, margin-by-mutilation, optimistic 120-seat pricing and treating learner-relevance as decoration.

Final KPIs track Client-Fit, Gross Margin %, Learner-Relevance and the bid outcome against a EUR 480k cap and a 20% floor.

Who it is for

An intermediate simulation for participants who already know the core concepts of the subject, designed for master's and MBA programmes.

How a session runs

  1. The instructor creates a session from the Eureka dashboard and invites the participants.
  2. Participants play 4 rounds. In each one they submit their decisions and the simulation calculates the results.
  3. The simulation can be run in English, Español.
  4. The instructor follows each participant's progress and results from the dashboard, and uses the class results for the debrief.

Decisions participants make

The decisions participants make during the simulation:

  • Three stakeholders want three things. What is the single fundable primary objective?
  • You have a survey of 120 time-poor managers asking for practical, not theory. How does it enter the design?
  • How squarely does your one-page decode confront the €46k margin gap to the €384k ceiling? (%)
  • Allocate the fixed €90k design budget across the five modules (must total €90k)
  • Where do you build bespoke content (high fit, high cost) versus lean on the proven open catalogue?
  • Open-enrolment substitution — what share of contact hours runs on proven open modules? (≤40%)
  • The first costing is €430k — €46k over the €384k ceiling. Which lever closes the gap?
  • Combine a second lever to finish closing the gap?
  • The client guarantees only 90 of 120 seats. What fill do you price the per-learner economics on?
  • The panel challenges the open/custom mix as "too generic / too expensive." How do you defend it?

What participants track

What participants follow on screen as the rounds go by:

  • Fit, Margin & Relevance Trajectory

Subjects covered

Designed for courses in Education & Pedagogy.

Ready to use The Custom Brief — Scope Téléphonie Méridien at Alpina Executive Learning with your students?

Contact us and we'll set you up with a free trial session.

Contact us