Industry Verticals · Education & Pedagogy

Curriculum Architect — ICAD's Seven-Week Sprint

A four-round, advanced executive-education design simulation set inside Instituto Cumbre de Alta Dirección (ICAD), the exec-ed arm of a Monterrey private university billing ~MXN 210M/year, AACSB-accredited and preparing an EQUIS review.

4 rounds Executive English, Español

Preview

About this simulation

A four-round, advanced executive-education design simulation set inside Instituto Cumbre de Alta Dirección (ICAD), the exec-ed arm of a Monterrey private university billing ~MXN 210M/year, AACSB-accredited and preparing an EQUIS review.

On Tuesday 14 April 2026 a MXN 60-billion industrial group signs a custom "Leading Enterprise Transformation" program for 35 directors with a hard launch on Monday 1 June and committee sign-off due Friday 8 May.

The design must be locked in seven weeks under four binding constraints: a 96 contact-hour envelope (12 days × 8h, cut from a 140h scope — 44h must go), six contractually-required learning outcomes (strategy execution, financial acumen, leading change, customer/market, digital, personal leadership), only 9 of 28 core faculty free in the window with the two strongest change professors already committed, and an assurance-of-learning audit trail where an outcome that is taught but never assessed is an audit failure — with 20% of ICAD's fee tied to a post-program outcome assessment and a rival business school already pitching the client.

Playing the program design team, you (1) DIAGNOSE the brief — frame the constraints as one joint system, read the coverage matrix to find gaps and redundancies, and confirm the hours math against the 96h cap; (2) SEQUENCE & SELECT modules to fit 96 hours into a deliberate foundations → application → integration → personal-leadership arc rather than a playlist of good sessions; (3) set the FACULTY-vs-PRACTITIONER delivery mix without strip-mining the two star professors or hollowing out qualified-faculty coverage, and design ASSESSMENTS that evidence each outcome (pre/post diagnostic, applied project on the client's real transformation, faculty-graded deliverable); and (4) DEFEND the design to the quality-and-accreditation committee chair with the client CHRO in the room.

The math rewards a coherent, assessment-aligned design that clears all four KPIs at once — and punishes the five classic errors: coverage over capacity (blowing the 96h cap), a playlist with no arc, star-faculty overload, outcomes taught but never assessed, and practitioner-everywhere staffing. Final KPIs track Outcome Coverage %, Faculty Utilization, Participant Satisfaction and Accreditation Compliance.

Who it is for

An advanced simulation for participants used to working with the main frameworks and trade-offs of the subject, designed for executive education and experienced professionals.

How a session runs

  1. The instructor creates a session from the Eureka dashboard and invites the participants.
  2. Participants play 4 rounds. In each one they submit their decisions and the simulation calculates the results.
  3. The simulation can be run in English, Español.
  4. The instructor follows each participant's progress and results from the dashboard, and uses the class results for the debrief.

Decisions participants make

The decisions participants make during the simulation:

  • How does the team read the brief?
  • Reading the coverage matrix, which outcome is the weakest-served gap to protect?
  • Confirm the hours math: the candidate menu scopes ~140h against a 96h cap. What do you tell the board?
  • Allocate the 96 contact hours across the four arc blocks (must total exactly 96h)
  • Sequence the four blocks across the 12 days.
  • Spacing across the 4-month window.
  • Delivery mix — share of the 12 teaching days led by core faculty vs practitioners (%)
  • How heavily do you lean on the two strongest available professors?
  • Assessment design — how is each outcome evidenced for the audit and the 20% at-risk fee?
  • How many of the six outcomes get a dedicated, graded assessment instrument?

What participants track

What participants follow on screen as the rounds go by:

  • Coverage, Utilization, Satisfaction & Accreditation Trajectory

Subjects covered

Designed for courses in Education & Pedagogy.

Ready to use Curriculum Architect — ICAD's Seven-Week Sprint with your students?

Contact us and we'll set you up with a free trial session.

Contact us