Leadership & Negotiation · Negotiation & Influence

PromoAdvocacy: Make the Case When the Panel Is Skeptical

Build the written case to promote a high-performing report through a skeptical panel. Across 4 rounds in the 14 days before the panel, practice rubric-mapped evidence, the honest-gap clause, pre-wires, in-room defer-to-approve bridging, and same-day post-panel debriefs.

4 rounds Executive English, Español
All simulations Get started
Preview

Who it is for

An advanced simulation for participants used to working with the main frameworks and trade-offs of the subject, designed for executive education and experienced professionals.

How a session runs

  1. The instructor creates a session from the Eureka dashboard and invites the participants.
  2. Participants play 4 rounds. In each one they submit their decisions and the simulation calculates the results.
  3. The simulation can be run in English, Español.
  4. The instructor follows each participant's progress and results from the dashboard, and uses the class results for the debrief.

Decisions participants make

The decisions participants make during the simulation:

  • How many rubric competencies did you map?
  • Evidence items per competency
  • Did you flag a competency where evidence is genuinely thin?
  • Headline paragraph approach
  • Comparison anchor (peer promoted last cycle)
  • Honest-gap clause + mitigation
  • Written case length
  • How many panelists will you pre-wire?
  • Pre-wire opening question
  • In-room opening

What participants track

What participants follow on screen as the rounds go by:

  • Case and Approval Trajectory

Subjects covered

Designed for courses in Negotiation & Influence.

See all Leadership & Negotiation simulations →

Ready to use PromoAdvocacy: Make the Case When the Panel Is Skeptical with your students?

Contact us and we'll set you up with a free trial session.

Contact us