Risk on the Balance Sheet — Rheinwerk's Covenant Test

A four-round, advanced corporate-finance and enterprise-risk simulation set inside Rheinwerk Komponenten AG, a EUR 540M Mittelstand automotive-supplier group in Wetzlar, Germany (EUR 59.4M EBITDA, EUR 210M net debt, 3.5x leverage against a 3.75x covenant ceiling).

On 14 September 2026 a covenant-test letter lands the same week three risks crystallise at once: a EUR 60M bond matures in nine months while unrestricted cash is only EUR 28M and the revolver is nearly drawn; the aluminium index is up 18% and the FX book is unhedged; and 38% of revenue still depends on combustion platforms OEMs are phasing out. Combined 12-month earnings Value-at-Risk is EUR 24M — 40% of EBITDA.

The CFO has 30 days to table a board-approved risk-and-capital plan before the 15 October covenant test.

Playing the Group CFO, you (1) build an enterprise risk map and recompute VaR once you account for the correlation between FX exposure and the OEM that stretched your payment terms — discovering that correlated risks add far more VaR than the sum of standalone exposures; (2) allocate a constrained EUR 12M risk budget across commodity collars, layered FX hedges, a precautionary liquidity reserve, receivables factoring and credit insurance, to cut earnings VaR below the EUR 15M board tolerance AND keep liquidity headroom at or above EUR 20M — because hedging the P&L while ignoring the maturity wall kills the company first; (3) choose a restructuring path under the liquidity constraint — Defend (EUR 25M EV-conversion capex that pushes leverage to ~3.9x and breaches the covenant unless sequenced), Reshape (close the loss-making Hungary site for a EUR 8M one-off and +EUR 3M EBITDA), or Deleverage (a EUR 55M Plzeň sale-and-leaseback that cuts leverage to 2.6x but surrenders the plant best placed for EV parts) — each screened on a pro-forma covenant calculation; and (4) defend the plan to the lead bank's credit committee, which offers a covenant waiver only at a higher margin and an amortisation schedule, forcing a negotiated trade-off between flexibility and cost.

The math rewards correlation-aware VaR sizing, a risk budget that buys down earnings risk AND survival risk, a covenant-screened restructuring choice, and a negotiated waiver — and punishes the five classic CFO errors: treating risks as independent, hedging the P&L while ignoring the maturity wall, choosing EV conversion without checking the covenant, deleveraging at the cost of optionality, and accepting the bank's terms passively.

Final KPIs track earnings VaR (EUR M), liquidity headroom (EUR M), pro-forma leverage (x EBITDA) and a financial-resilience score, per Ulrich Hommel's integrated ERM view that treats financial flexibility as a strategic asset.

An advanced simulation for participants used to working with the main frameworks and trade-offs of the subject, designed for executive education and experienced professionals.