Engaging the State — Shape the Energy Rule at Hélios Énergie

A four-round, advanced non-market strategy simulation set inside Hélios Énergie S.A., the third-largest non-incumbent gas and power retailer in France (€4.6bn revenue, 3.1 million customers in Nouvelle-Aquitaine and Occitanie, a fair-price brand worth an estimated €180M premium). On 14 April 2026 the regulator (CRE) opens a 90-day consultation on a draft Consumer Energy Protection rule.

Written to punish teaser-pricing discounters, as drafted it also sweeps in Hélios: a price cap below hedging cost would cut operating margin from 6.5% to 3.8% (≈€124M/yr of profit at risk), an early-exit-fee ban removes ≈€38M/yr and lifts churn 14%→21%, and new disclosure obligations cost €22M one-off plus €9M/yr.

Playing the Director of Corporate & Public Affairs with a fixed €1.6M non-market budget and a four-person team, you (1) read the institutional field and triage the draft's clauses into support / oppose / amend instead of fighting all of it; (2) set the engagement strategy and frame, allocating the €1.6M across CRE submission, bilateral meetings, op-eds, customer mobilisation, independent economic research and external counsel, and choosing whether to argue narrow margin self-interest or reframe the cap as a threat to the very consumers the rule protects; (3) build the coalition before the 30 May UFE deadline — lead, join, free-ride or break ranks toward a consumer-group ally, while refusing the toxic discount-rival front and the incumbent's SME-sacrificing pact; and (4) execute the endgame, balancing inside (lobbying) and outside (public) tactics and defending all four KPIs to a CRE commissioner and a hostile journalist.

The math is grounded in Von Staden's institutional-logics lens, Baron's non-market strategy, Olson's collective-action trap and Fombrun's reputational capital: legitimacy-bearing framing, selective opposition, peer-credible coalitions and inside-outside complementarity score best, while the five classic errors — self-interest framing, total opposition, the toxic discount coalition, free-riding the association, and inside-only lobbying with no public air cover — measurably underperform, the last two triggering the Ministry's escalation to a harsher statute.

Final KPIs track Regulatory Outcome, Legitimacy, Coalition Strength and Reputational Risk simultaneously, against the €1.6M budget cap.

An advanced simulation for participants used to working with the main frameworks and trade-offs of the subject, designed for executive education and experienced professionals.