Eureka Case 25 min Ethics & Governance

Who Convenes the Table

You are Esperanza Quiroga-Tapia, 41, Director of Community Affairs at Bauxia Andes Resources in Lima. At dawn on 29 April 2026 a federation of 23 Andean communities suspended all company activity on its land and gave Bauxia ten working days to answer five conditions. Your chief executive wants your recommendation by Friday: how does Bauxia come to the table?

The situation

Bauxia is a Peruvian-Chilean bauxite and aluminium group: USD 2.1 billion of revenue in 2025, about 3,400 people and USD 780 million of senior secured debt due for refinancing in 2027. A development-finance institution holds 12% of that facility, under an environmental-and-social clause. The Quebrada Yanaorco haul road, which crosses the land of the Comunidad Campesina de Pampacolca (about 4,200 people), carries 71% of this year's bauxite to the port. Treasury reckons the balance sheet can absorb 14 days of blockade before the cash-sweep covenant breaches, in the middle of a bondholder roadshow that opened on Monday.

Pampacolca's asamblea voted to block the road by 874 to 121, with 67 abstentions. The next night the federation ratified the vote and sent the memorandum. Four of its five conditions go back to the 2019 consultation: held after the environmental assessment was already approved, on a 142-page Spanish document circulated three working days before the vote, and closed by an agreement signed by three representatives whose authority the federation now disputes. That agreement pays the comunidad PEN 1.8 million a year. Until it has an answer, the federation will not meet the company without outside guarantors.

Your own dashboard is grim: a social-licence index of 22 out of 100 (the band labelled "Withdrawal"), community trust at 18 and board confidence at 50. Augusto Marchena-Ríos, VP Operations, holds that the 2019 agreement is a signed contract and that reopening it under a blockade will bring the same demand to Bauxia's other three sites; he has the pleadings drafted. Javier Loayza, the bishop of Aplao, offered in February to convene talks. You have warned the executive committee in writing three times since November.

Your job in this case: read who stands on the other side and what each of them can give or withhold, run the numbers on the blockade clock, and recommend on Friday how Bauxia opens the conversation. Every other decision of the next six weeks will rest on this one.

The decision

How does Bauxia open the engagement with the communities?

  • A · A table with Pampacolca's leaders alone
  • B · A new consultation led by the federation
  • C · A new consultation, with outside guarantors

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →