You are Deniz Aydin, Director of the Executive Development Unit at Bosphorus Management School. A flagship account and your unit's credibility hinge on this call.
A large conglomerate's CEO commissioned a custom development programme for 120 rising leaders and specified the content himself: strategy frameworks and financial acumen. Your unit's discovery interviews and a diagnostic survey reveal a different gap. The rising leaders struggle most with leading through ambiguity, cross-divisional collaboration, and difficult conversations. The sponsor is confident, powerful, and paying, and expects the programme he asked for. The unit's reputation rests on development that actually changes behavior.
You decide how to respond when a corporate sponsor's brief conflicts with what the target leaders actually need.
The decision
How should the Executive Development Unit reconcile the sponsor's brief with the diagnostic evidence?
A - Build exactly what he ordered
B - Evidence-led reframing
C - Quietly substitute the content
The rest of the case is locked
The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.
Have an access code?
No code yet?
Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.
Request access to this case
Loading…
Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →