Eureka Case 25 min Marketing

The Portal Letter

You are Bieke Vandenberghe, B2B marketing director of Verlinden Industrial Solutions, a Belgian maker and distributor of fasteners, seals and fluid-handling components. Your largest customer has given you until 1 September to plug into its procurement portal or lose most of its business. Before a euro of the board's €6 million moves, you have to say where Verlinden's advantage is really eroding.

The situation

Kortrijk, 11 March 2026. Verlinden turned over €184 million in 2025 at a 12% EBITDA margin. It serves 3,200 industrial accounts from a catalogue of 28,000 SKUs and employs 290 people: 64 in field and inside sales, and 38 applications engineers who specify the right part for each customer's machine. For six years you have built the company's marketing on one idea: customers do not buy fasteners and gaskets, they buy the certainty that the specified part will work.

The letter is from Hanssen Food Systems, which buys €14.8 million a year, 8% of revenue. In the third quarter it will move its purchasing onto a digital portal: suppliers that by 1 September cannot integrate through EDI or punch-out and show live stock and prices through an API will drop to a backup tier, capped at 30% of category spend. For Verlinden that would mean roughly €10.4 million a year less. Eleven other accounts, worth €41 million together (22% of revenue), have signalled through the CRM that they expect the same.

There are other signals. The win rate on competitive quotes has fallen from 41% to 33% in two years. Two pure-play online rivals quote in seconds, 6 to 9% below your list price. Only 9% of your sales are digital, against 28–35% in the sector; the board wants at least 28% within eighteen months. It has given you ninety days to bring a recommendation and a single budget to fund it: €6.0 million over eighteen months, with no top-up.

Your job in this case: read the signals and decide which diagnosis your plan will rest on: what is really pushing customers towards other suppliers. How the money is spent comes later, and will depend on this answer.

The decision

Where is Verlinden's value proposition really eroding?

  • A · Price: the pure-plays are simply cheaper
  • B · Product: the parts no longer set you apart
  • C · Access: customers cannot order digitally

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →