Eureka Case 25 min Undergrad

Patent or Pool

You are Anders Holt, Chief Innovation Officer at Nordfjord Marine Nutrition. The wrong IP strategy either strands a costly invention or hands rivals a free ride.

Nordfjord's R&D team has developed a microbial feed additive that cuts salmon sea-lice susceptibility and improves feed-conversion by an estimated 7 percent. It cost 40 million kroner and four years to develop. The salmon value chain is concentrated: a handful of large farmers, tight regulators, and integrated feed rivals. A patent could give exclusivity, but enforcement across borders is costly and rivals may invent around a narrow claim. Standardised adoption, by contrast, could raise Nordfjord's ingredient volumes and set an industry norm it controls.

You decide whether an aquaculture firm should patent a breakthrough feed additive or license it openly across the value chain.

The decision

What intellectual-property and commercialisation strategy should Nordfjord adopt for the additive?

  • A - Broad patent, exclusive supply
  • B - Core patent plus licensed standard
  • C - Trade secret, no filing

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →