Eureka Case 25 min Negotiation

What Voltaic Really Wants

You are Kavita Rao, strategy director of Sundara Mobility in Bengaluru. A German battery maker has signed a term sheet for a joint venture that would give Sundara the cell technology its next vehicles need, and its counsel has made clear that Voltaic wants a majority. You have sixty days to turn the term sheet into binding heads of agreement, and the first thing to settle is what that request is really about.

The situation

Sundara, founded in 2009, makes electric two- and three-wheelers and battery systems: about ₹8,200 crore of revenue, a 12% EBITDA margin, 6,400 people in two plants, and 11% of India's electric three-wheeler market. It builds its own battery-management systems and software in-house, but lacks the solid-state cell chemistry its next models need, and the capital and years to develop it alone.

Voltaic Cells GmbH has that chemistry and wants what Sundara has: manufacturing, distribution and regulatory standing in India. On 12 May the two signed a term sheet for EV-Cell India at a fixed enterprise value of $300 million. Voltaic brings $170 million of cell technology and $40 million in cash; Sundara's plants, network, regulatory relationships and software team are valued independently at between $90 million and $130 million, depending on how the software is counted.

If there are no binding heads of agreement within sixty days, Voltaic is free to sign the same deal with Sundara's largest domestic rival, which would cost Sundara an estimated 3–4 points of market share within two years. And Sundara carries a scar: in 2019 a foreign licensing partner used the product roadmap Sundara had shared to launch a rival three-wheeler in Sundara's own cities. You watched that from operations. The board approved the Voltaic talks only if nothing in the final structure could let it happen again.

A partner-trust index Sundara has tracked since then reads 55 out of 100: wary rather than warm, in the words of both sides' advisers. Voltaic's counsel expects your call by Friday.

Your job in this case: look at what each side brings and at what is at stake; test how the equity percentages line up against the contributions; and decide what you believe sits behind Voltaic's demand for a majority before you answer it.

The decision

What is Voltaic really protecting when it asks for a majority?

  • A · Its returns: a payout that matches its money
  • B · Its chemistry: keeping the cells from leaking
  • C · Its voice: board seats to match its stake

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →