Eureka Case 25 min Strategy

Room to Turn

You are Rohini Deshmukh, eleven days into the job as Head of Strategy at Aarav Mobility Systems in Pune, India. Three divisions are asking for ₹1,900 crore; the board has approved ₹1,200 crore. Before you split a single rupee, the strategy committee wants your opening posture on May 8.

The situation

Aarav makes powertrain components, control electronics and software modules for truck and off-highway manufacturers: ₹6,800 crore of revenue in FY2025 (about US$815 million), a 13.5% EBITDA margin, 9,400 people and 44% of sales exported to 22 countries. Combustion powertrain brings in 71% of revenue at a 14% divisional margin, but it is shrinking 6% to 9% a year, and two anchor customers have said they expect to halve their combustion orders within three years. The electrified and software-defined-vehicle lines are the other 29%: growing above 30% a year, at a −4% margin. They have bid for three vehicle-platform contracts in eighteen months and been shortlisted for none.

The three asks do not mention one another. Prakash Iyer's combustion division wants ₹900 crore to hold its business flat. Tanvi Menon's electrified line wants ₹480 crore to hire, to tool up and perhaps to buy a forty-engineer software firm. The international team wants ₹520 crore for a plant in Southeast Asia. Suhas Rane, the chief financial officer, has already warned you: every rupee left unallocated earns nothing, and he is the one who will have to explain it.

The risk committee has listed three discontinuities that could land inside the four-quarter cycle — a withdrawal of electric-vehicle subsidies that would revive combustion for a while, a fall in combustion orders faster than the trend, an anchor customer taking a module in-house — and refuses to say which. Planners estimate that a company still redeploying long after such an event gives up 6 to 9 points of its contested electric share, for good. The chair, Anil Barve, has given you four quarters and one sentence: make Aarav resilient by design rather than dependent on a single shrinking platform.

Your job in this case: set the two businesses side by side, work out what keeping capital in hand would cost and what it might buy, and choose the posture you will defend on May 8: which business you protect, which you push, and whether anything stays unallocated.

The decision

What opening posture do you take to the strategy committee?

  • A · Defend the core: protect the cash engine
  • B · Commit to electric: move now, at scale
  • C · Run both: fund each and hold capital back

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →