Eureka Case 25 min Sustainability

One Class Behind

You are Maja Zupan, Strategy Director of Alpina Domus, an appliance maker in Velenje, Slovenia. The board has just authorised €9.0 million for green innovation, and before a single euro moves you have to tell the chair what environmental posture the company is going to take.

The situation

Alpina Domus makes washing machines, dishwashers and built-in ovens in a single plant: €218 million of revenue in 2025, a 7.2% EBIT margin and 1,180 people. A little over half the volume is sold under its own brand, known across the EU for durability; the other 46% is white label for two larger groups, Nordhaus and Verel. Two rivals, Brenner and Solvane, earn 10–12% margins, spend about three times as much on research and sit a full energy-label class above you. Seventy-one per cent of your plant's electricity comes off the grid.

On 4 March 2026 two notices arrived four hours apart. Brussels confirmed that Ecodesign and Energy Labelling thresholds for wet appliances will tighten in 24 months: 38% of your models, carrying €83 million of revenue, will fail them without redesign. Then the tender desk reported that a €19 million, three-year white-label contract you had held for six years had gone to a competitor one label class higher. Winning that volume back on the open market would take price cuts of 4–6%, and both Nordhaus and Verel say that without a credible environmental strategy they will take a second supplier within 18 months: another €41 million of volume in play.

Two outside decisions are still open, and both will be settled before the money has to move: a national subsidy of up to 30% of clean-manufacturing investment, expected but not enacted, and an EU carbon-border adjustment on imported components that would add about €2.4 million a year. You proposed a green programme in 2023 and again in 2024; both times the board said no on payback. The chair, Andrej Lah, approved this one with a condition: he will not accept a plan that clears the new thresholds and stops there.

Your job in this case: read the exposure and the gap to the leaders, put numbers on what is at stake, and choose the posture you will take to the board, before anyone argues about how to split the €9.0 million.

The decision

Before a euro moves, what environmental posture do you take to the board?

  • A · Comply on time, and not a euro more
  • B · Set the posture once the policy lands
  • C · Lead in one segment, comply in the rest

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →