Eureka Case 30 min Undergrad

Nine Projects, One Budget

You are Iván Establier-Roca, Chief Innovation Officer of Aromática Mediterránea, a Barcelona ingredients house. The board has frozen next year's R&D budget at €14M. Nine projects are asking for €24M. In two weeks you commit to a portfolio shape.

The situation

Aromática Mediterránea makes €210M a year selling natural flavour systems, functional plant-protein ingredients and enzyme preparations to food and beverage manufacturers across Iberia and, lately, France and Italy. R&D is the engine: roughly 70% of this year's revenue comes from products that did not exist five years ago. That number is the whole company in one statistic — and it is the number you are paid to protect.

Growth has cooled, so the board has held the R&D budget flat at €14M. You have nine candidate projects. Three are incremental improvements to today's range (Horizon 1). Three are adjacent new platforms, two to four years out (Horizon 2). Three are genuine breakthroughs — new science, five years or more, large prizes (Horizon 3). The CFO has circulated a risk-adjusted NPV ranking with a one-line recommendation: "Fund down the list until the money runs out."

Your job in this case: review the nine projects, see what the CFO's ranking does to the pipeline, model the allocation across the three horizons, and commit to a portfolio shape you will defend to the budget committee.

The decision

What shape is the portfolio?

  • A · Fund the ranking
  • B · Balance by horizon
  • C · Protect the core, one big bet

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →