Eureka Case 30 min Undergrad

The EVP Rebuild

You are Renata Mendonça-Albuquerque, 44, CHRO of Paguei, a São Paulo-listed fintech (B3: PGUI3) with 1,820 employees and R$ 2.4B annual revenue. The board has given you eight weeks to put a new Employee Value Proposition on the table. The two-year attrition number is the reason.

The situation

Paguei is the fourth-largest payments-orchestration platform in Brazil — a profitable, 11-year-old firm whose IPO in 2023 unlocked an aggressive product roadmap and a senior-engineering hiring war. For 18 months it worked: headcount in product-and-engineering doubled to 740. Then, in the last 12 months, you lost 28% of senior engineers (L5 and above) — most of them to Google Cloud's São Paulo expansion, Mercado Libre's payments arm, and a handful to fully-remote US-headquartered firms paying in dollars.

You raised base comp twice. You added a retention bonus cycle. The regretted-attrition number kept climbing. Exit interviews tell a confused story: half the leavers said "compensation"; half said something else — "I want to ship faster", "I want to work on harder problems", "I don't feel proud telling people where I work". Your CEO, Felipe Carvajal, has approved a one-time R$ 14M EVP-rebuild investment and wants a positioning paper for the board in eight weeks. Two senior people on your team think the answer is "match the FAANG offer". You're not sure.

Your job in this case: read the candidate-and-attrition data, model the EVP investment trade-offs across three plausible positionings, and commit to one EVP architecture. The board reads the paper in eight weeks. The 2026 hiring plan needs 180 senior engineers — you do not get there with the EVP you have today.

The decision

Three EVP positionings

  • A · "Pay top of market" — compensation-led EVP
  • B · "Build the financial system Brazil needs" — mission-led EVP
  • C · "Engineering craft capital of LATAM" — craft-led EVP

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →