Eureka Case 25 min Leadership & People

Before the Names

You are Helen Ashworth, chair of the board of Pennine Cardiac Institute in Leeds. The director of your largest unit has resigned, the national registry closes in fourteen weeks, and two finalists are waiting. Before the board compares them, you must decide what the post needs above all.

The situation

On Wednesday 4 February 2026 Professor Alan Voss, who has run Pennine Cardiac Institute's (PCI) interventional cardiology unit for nine years, resigned to take a chair abroad. He leaves in twelve weeks. He has written the unit's submission to the national cardiac registry himself every year since 2017, and the registry closes its data window on 15 May. The unit brings in £41 million of the institute's £88 million turnover; the operating surplus is £4.4 million.

What PCI sells to the commissioners who buy its NHS activity, to referring cardiologists and to trials sponsors is the outcomes it publishes in that registry. Two commissioners hold outcome-contingent clauses: a ranking below the top quartile puts £12 million of activity out to re-tender. The board's running read of the submission is 62 out of 100, against 70 for the top quartile. And £6 million of trials funding names a principal investigator of record, a role sponsors accept only from a credentialed cardiologist.

Of the unit's eleven consultants, four have signalled they might follow Voss or move to a rival London centre that has been recruiting PCI's registrars since the autumn. Each replacement costs about £180,000 and takes nine months. The board's index of whether the unit believes its leader understands its work stands at 30 with the post vacant. You have £350,000 approved for the transition.

Two finalists came through a shortlist of nine. Dr Priya Anand, 44, is an interventional cardiologist in London with a top-decile personal outcomes record and no management post behind her. Marcus Reeve, 51, has led two NHS turnarounds, carries a £60 million budget and has no clinical background. Your board has split three ways: some see an operating problem, some a clinical one, some a question of leadership pure and simple. You came to PCI from finance, not medicine.

Your job in this case: look at what is at stake and on what timetable, put a price on what could go wrong, and decide which source of authority the board will recruit for. The comparison of the two names comes after that, and will be judged against it.

The decision

What must the unit's next director bring above all?

  • A · Clinical standing: peer trust and trials eligibility
  • B · Managerial delivery: rota, budget and commissioners
  • C · Leadership itself: judgement, presence, communication

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →