Eureka Case 25 min Marketing

For My Mother

You are Mariana Sequeira, head of innovation at Lumière Living, a Porto design house. Your first product for the over-60s, a lamp, worked in testing, and still almost nobody wanted it. Before a euro of the €4.0 million the board has set aside is spent, you have to tell it what exactly was rejected.

The situation

Lumière sells lighting, furniture and household objects across Europe: €38 million of revenue at a 9% operating margin, 160 employees and an in-house studio of 22 designers. Its reputation rests on objects people want to be seen owning, and its buyers are mostly urban 30- to 45-year-olds. The board has ring-fenced €4.0 million to enter the longevity market, and there will be no more.

The first concept was a table lamp with oversized controls and an emergency button, built to a brief you wrote and signed. A panel of 90 people aged 60 to 75 tried it: 71% said it made them feel old, and purchase intent came back at 8%, against the 25% Lumière requires to fund a launch. A 68-year-old woman from Matosinhos turned it over, set it down, said it was beautifully made and added that it would be perfect for her mother.

The serviceable market is worth €90 million a year, but it does not behave as one: between 60 and 70 people buy on self-image; from 75 on, on function and safety, and through assistance channels. You have twelve weeks to a committed go or no-go, an autumn retail slot that will not wait for a second cycle, and a Scandinavian brand preparing its own "dignified ageing" line.

Inside the company nobody reads the result the same way. Engineering sees an incomplete product. The commercial team sees a price nobody has tested. The studio sees an object that says something about its owner that its owner does not accept. The board will measure your plan on four numbers: purchase intent, the product's personal and societal value (20 and 15 out of 100 for the lamp) and a payback period the CFO will not sign above 30 months.

Your job in this case: read the panel results and what is at stake, test in a simple model what would have to change to reach 25%, and choose the diagnosis you will take to the board.

The decision

What did the panel reject?

  • A · They rejected what the lamp says about them
  • B · They rejected a product that falls short
  • C · They rejected the price for what it offers

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →