Eureka Case 30 min Undergrad

The Check-in Rebuild

You are Mireia Sallent-Borja, 38, Chief People Officer at HostalSoft, a Barcelona-based vertical-SaaS for boutique hotels. Eighteen months ago you killed the annual review and replaced it with "continuous check-ins". Q1 employee-survey results came in this week. The CEO wants a redesign plan by the next board meeting in five weeks.

The situation

HostalSoft has 420 employees across engineering, customer success, sales, and operations — €38M ARR, growing 31% YoY. When you arrived, the annual review was a six-week ritual that consumed an estimated 18,000 manager-hours, produced ratings 78% of people called "unfair or arbitrary", and explained almost none of the variance in next-year performance. You scrapped it. The replacement: every manager runs a 30-minute "check-in" with each direct report every two weeks; a lightweight reflection captured at the end; calibration discussions reduced from a quarterly two-day off-site to a single half-day in November.

Eighteen months in, the picture is split. Survey item "my manager gives me feedback that helps me improve" went from 41% favorable to 58%. But: regretted attrition crept from 9.2% to 11.7%, promotion velocity fell from 14 months average tenure-to-first-promotion to 19, and a calibration audit found that only 53% of managers had run any meaningful comparison conversation about their team in the last six months. New CFO Andreu Vallcorba asked you bluntly last Tuesday: "Are we sure we didn't just delete performance management?"

Your job in this case: read the people-data, model the trade-offs across cadence, manager training, and calibration anchors, and choose what the v3 of the performance system looks like. The CEO wants one clear recommendation, not three options. The 420 people who depend on you reading this correctly are listening on the other side.

The decision

What does v3 of performance look like at HostalSoft?

  • A · Hybrid revert (continuous + annual rating)
  • B · Double down on continuous (with real anchors)
  • C · Tier the cadence by role family

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →