Eureka Case 25 min Ethics & Governance

Three of Forty

You are Meera Kapoor, three weeks into the job as Division President of Northwind Mobility, a car-seat and stroller maker in London, Ontario. Your flagship seat, Aurora, is due on retail shelves on 25 November. Before Thursday's board meeting you must decide what kind of problem its latest test file is.

The situation

Aurora carries 40% of the division's planned growth and CA$62 million of first-year revenue. It has passed every mandatory regulatory sled test. It has also failed Northwind's own, stricter margin-of-safety standard in three of forty high-temperature trials, all at the hot end of the range. The cause is a late switch to a cheaper side-impact foam, made to hit the board's margin target, which saved CA$1.8 million. As built, the seat is legal to sell.

Fixing it means a new foam supplier and re-tooling: CA$4.2 million and a seven-week slip, past the holiday shelf window. Finance puts the cost of missing that window at about CA$22 million of first-year sales, plus a likely lost end-cap slot at three big-box retailers that have already taken pre-orders. Finance also sizes a recall-and-reputation event, if the seat ships unfixed, at CA$30–80 million. A remediation budget of CA$6.0 million sits uncommitted.

Northwind (CA$310 million revenue, 9% EBIT margin, 1,400 people) made its name as the safety-first challenger: "beyond the minimum". Eighteen months ago a value-oriented holding company bought it and installed a cost-reduction programme, and its board appointed you, an operations leader known for hitting dates without cutting shop-floor corners, to protect margin. Your Head of Engineering & Quality, whom you barely know, put the results in writing rather than mention them in a corridor. The board chair's assistant has already asked for fifteen minutes on Thursday.

Your job in this case: before anyone argues ship or delay, decide how to name the problem: which considerations count, and how much. Explore the test file, the money and the calendar, put your own numbers on the risk, and choose the frame you will take into Thursday's meeting.

The decision

Before ship or delay: what kind of problem is Aurora?

  • A · A money decision: weigh the costs on both sides
  • B · A compliance decision: the law sets the bar
  • C · A judgment call: law, money and promise together

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →