Eureka Case 25 min Undergrad

AI in the Cohort

You are Julien Mercier, Head of Tailor-Made Programs at Rhone Leadership Institute. Get the AI balance wrong and you either look dated or replace the very learning clients pay a premium for.

Rhone's signature method is action learning: executives tackle real business challenges in facilitated teams over several months. A major client now wants AI woven throughout, expecting faster insight, personalised coaching and efficiency, and is partly benchmarking Rhone against cheaper AI-driven learning platforms. But Rhone's differentiation and pricing rest on the human, experiential struggle of action learning, where wrestling with ambiguity builds judgment. Overusing AI could let executives shortcut the productive difficulty and reduce facilitators to onlookers, while ignoring AI would make the program look behind the market.

You decide how to weave AI tools into an action-learning executive program without hollowing out the human development at its core..

The decision

How should Rhone integrate AI into its action-learning tailor-made program?

  • A - AI-first redesign
  • B - AI as amplifier
  • C - Keep it purely human

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →