Eureka Case 20 min Undergrad

The Q3 Talent Plan

You are Inés Roigé-Castell, head of People at Cardumen Software, a Barcelona B2B SaaS scale-up that just sold the board on a 55% revenue plan. Three leadership seats are unfilled and the calendar is unforgiving. Build, buy or borrow — and for which seat — is the year's most consequential decision you own.

The situation

Cardumen Software S.L. Barcelona-based B2B SaaS for supply-chain optimisation in mid-market manufacturing, founded in 2020 by two ex-Glovo engineers. FY2025 revenue €4.2M, 38 employees, EBITDA-neutral. The Series A from Kibo Ventures closed in March 2025 at €18M post; the plan you signed up for is €6.5M revenue and 60 employees by Q4 2026 — a 55% top-line jump and 58% headcount growth in twelve months. The board reviews the operating plan in October.

You joined nine months ago, in August 2025, from Wallapop where you spent three years as Director of People Ops, after four at Glovo as Head of HR Business Partners. You are thirty-nine and you have lived through exactly this transition twice before — the second time properly. Marc Tort, the CEO, has given you until 30 September 2026 to have three seats filled and onboarded. The seats are the structural unlocks for the plan, in this order of urgency:

  1. Senior Engineering Manager — the engineering team scales from fourteen to twenty-four ICs. The current Lead can't run a thirty-person org and Marc knows it.
  2. Head of Customer Success — the CS function goes from four to twelve in twelve months. Net Revenue Retention is currently 104%; the board model needs 118% to make the plan work.
  3. Chief Revenue Officer — Sales (currently five AEs reporting to the CEO) must become fifteen with formal segmentation, comp, and forecast discipline. Marc wants out of the seat by Q4 2026.

For each seat you have three theories of how to fill it: build (promote internally, train into the role), buy (recruit externally, full-time), or borrow (fractional, advisor, or operating-partner arrangement). The next screen lays out the nine cells. Then the trade-offs.

Your job in this case: read the three roles against three filling strategies, weight your constraints (urgency, risk tolerance, Q3 budget envelope) honestly, and pick the talent plan you will defend to Marc and the board. Promotions, hires and contracts you sign in Q3 lock the next eighteen months of operating capacity.
Headcount today / target Q4 202638 → 60 Revenue FY25 / plan FY26€4.2M → €6.5M Series A runway22 months Seats to fill by 30 Sep 20263 NRR today / plan104% → 118% Q3 talent budget envelope€200K – €600K

La decisión

What plan do you present to Marc at the October board?

  • A · Build all three — promote internally across Eng, CS, and Sales
  • B · Balanced Mix — build Eng, buy CS, borrow CRO (12 months)
  • C · Buy all three — recruit externally into every seat

El resto del caso está bloqueado

Los datos, los cálculos, la propia decisión y lo que pasa después se abren con el código de acceso de tu institución.

¿Tienes un código de acceso?

¿Aún no tienes código?

Los profesores pueden solicitar acceso para un curso. Cuéntanos quién eres y para qué curso es, y enviaremos un código a tu institución.

Úsalo en directo en clase: cada estudiante decide y lo justifica, y toda la clase ve cómo se reparte. Cómo funciona Eureka Case →