Skip to main content
Home / Alternatives / Eureka vs CompanyGame

Eureka vs CompanyGame

The most direct competitor in Spanish and LATAM: broad sector coverage and an inter-university tournament versus co-developed depth and short formats.

Who this is for

For Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking universities in Spain and LATAM comparing the broadest Spanish-language sector catalogue with a co-developed, deeper alternative.

Side-by-side comparison

Spotted an outdated fact? Email us at info@eurekasimulations.com and we'll fix it.

Dimension Eureka Simulations CompanyGame
Catalogue size 28 core simulations (18 co-developed with IESE) + an Express catalogue of short formats 35+ sector simulators (banking, hospitality, ESG, retail, technology, consumer goods, entrepreneurship…)
Languages Platform in 13 languages; Express in 9 (EN, ES, CA, DE, EU, FR, IT, PT, ZH) Native Spanish and Portuguese
MBA / Exec-Ed depth High — ExSim plus 18 simulations co-developed with IESE faculty Medium-high — undergraduate and MBA; broad sector coverage
Corporate L&D fit Medium-high — 90-minute Express format to scale to thousands of managers Medium-high — corporate business training
Deployment / hosting Cloud SaaS, 100% browser (Archimedes platform), EU-hosted (GDPR) Cloud SaaS, browser
Pricing tier $$ — €8–25/student; €4K–60K/year at institutional level $-$$ — affordable for LATAM
Customization High — co-development with the professor; custom-built simulations (€25–50K) Broad sector catalogue; co-creation
Integrations (LTI, SSO) LTI + SSO (SAML 2.0); integrates with Moodle, Canvas, Blackboard
Reporting / analytics Live instructor dashboard; decision data taggable by competency (AoL-ready) Results portal; team competition / inter-university tournament ("Reto")
Target geography Spain + LATAM (IESE family: IPADE, IAE, INALDE, PAD…); 50+ institutions, 10,000+ students Spain + LATAM (25+ countries, 600+ centres, 15,000+ students in competitions); Colombia, Mexico, Chile, Ecuador, Argentina, Bolivia

When CompanyGame is the better choice

CompanyGame is a strong competitor, deeply established in LATAM. If your case is one of these, they probably fit better.

  • You want the broadest sector coverage in Spanish and Portuguese (banking, hospitality, ESG, retail, technology…) ready to use.
  • The inter-university tournament format ("Reto") matters to you, to engage students and as a branding and recruitment tool.
  • They are already present in many universities in the region and you value that regional familiarity and an affordable price.

When Eureka is the better choice

Eureka wins when you want depth and technology, not just sector-catalogue breadth.

  • You want co-developed pedagogical depth (IESE-style) and real-time multiplayer with a live instructor dashboard, not just a broad catalogue.
  • You need 90-minute short formats (Express) and competency-taggable decision data for accreditation / Assurance of Learning.
  • You teach in more than two languages (the platform is in 13) or want a simulation tailored to your case.

Sometimes you use both

Very common in LATAM: combine CompanyGame's broad sector catalogue with Eureka's co-developed or executive-education simulations where more depth or a short format is needed.

Frequently asked questions

Eureka or CompanyGame?

CompanyGame is a Spanish vendor with strong LATAM presence, a very broad catalogue of sector simulators (35+) in Spanish and Portuguese, and an annual inter-university tournament ("Reto"). Eureka brings IESE faculty co-developed depth, real-time multiplayer, 90-minute short formats and a 13-language platform. If you want sector breadth in Spanish and the tournament format, CompanyGame; if you want pedagogical depth, short formats or more languages, Eureka.

What languages is CompanyGame available in?

CompanyGame offers its simulators in native Spanish and Portuguese. Eureka covers 13 languages on the platform and 9 in Express.

CompanyGame or Eureka for your university?

Tell us your programme and your LATAM goals and we will honestly tell you which one fits better.

Contact

Last reviewed: 2026-05

← See all comparisons

Let's talk?
Contact