Eureka vs Cesim
Two cloud strategy-simulation platforms, very similar in format. The difference is catalogue and languages versus co-developed depth.
For schools and universities looking for round-based, multi-decision strategy simulations and comparing two mature, serious cloud options.
Spotted an outdated fact? Email us at info@eurekasimulations.com and we'll fix it.
| Dimension | Eureka Simulations | Cesim |
|---|---|---|
| Catalogue size | 28 core simulations (18 co-developed with IESE) + an Express catalogue of short formats | 13+ simulations (Global Challenge, Marketing, Bank, Hospitality, Retail, Service…) |
| Languages | Platform in 13 languages; Express in 9 (EN, ES, CA, DE, EU, FR, IT, PT, ZH) | ~15 languages, incl. uncommon ones (EN, ES, PT, FR, IT, ZH, RU, TR, HU…) |
| MBA / Exec-Ed depth | High — ExSim plus 18 simulations co-developed with IESE faculty | High — strategy simulations widely used in MBAs; AACSB member |
| Corporate L&D fit | Medium-high — 90-minute Express format to scale to thousands of managers | Medium — "Microsimulations" for short training |
| Deployment / hosting | Cloud SaaS, 100% browser (Archimedes platform), EU-hosted (GDPR) | Cloud SaaS, 100% browser |
| Pricing tier | $$ — €8–25/student; €4K–60K/year at institutional level | $$ |
| Customization | High — co-development with the professor; custom-built simulations (€25–50K) | Closed catalogue, parameter-configurable; no co-development |
| Integrations (LTI, SSO) | LTI + SSO (SAML 2.0); integrates with Moodle, Canvas, Blackboard | LMS integration (enrolment, grades, content); LTI |
| Reporting / analytics | Live instructor dashboard; decision data taggable by competency (AoL-ready) | Team- and round-level results and dashboards |
| Target geography | Spain + LATAM (IESE family: IPADE, IAE, INALDE, PAD…); 50+ institutions, 10,000+ students | Global; Finnish origin (Helsinki), strong in Europe and the Nordics |
When Cesim is the better choice
Cesim is an excellent, established vendor. Be honest with yourself: if your case is one of these, they probably fit better than we do.
- You want a broad, standardized catalogue of ready-to-use strategy simulations, with no need for co-development.
- You need coverage of uncommon languages (Russian, Turkish, Hungarian…) for cohorts in Eastern Europe or Asia.
- You value a global brand with a long international track record and AACSB membership.
When Eureka is the better choice
Eureka wins when the priority is pedagogical fit and depth, rather than the size of the standard catalogue.
- You want a simulation co-developed with faculty (IESE-style) or tailored to your own case, not just parameter-configured.
- You operate in Spain or LATAM and value local presence, support in your time zone and an Express catalogue already mapped to programmes.
- You need 90-minute short formats (Express) to scale to many students or to corporate L&D.
Sometimes you use both
It is not unusual: use a full Cesim strategy simulation at the core of the MBA and complement it with Eureka Express for specific short modules (operations, ESG, finance) or executive-education workshops.
Frequently asked questions
Eureka or Cesim for an MBA?
Both serve round-based strategy simulations for MBAs. Cesim stands out for a broad catalogue and global language coverage; Eureka for faculty co-development (IESE-style), LATAM presence and short Express formats. If you want a simulation tailored to your case, Eureka; if you want a consolidated standard catalogue, Cesim.
How do they differ on languages?
Cesim offers around 15 languages, including some uncommon ones (Russian, Turkish, Hungarian). Eureka's platform is available in 13 languages and Express in 9, focused on Spanish, Portuguese and Western European languages.
Cesim or Eureka for your programme?
Tell us your case and we will honestly tell you which one fits better — even if it is the other one.
ContactLast reviewed: 2026-05