Eureka Case 25 min Undergrad

Commercializing The Lab

You are Dr. Aarav Mehta, Director of the Vindhya Institute for Applied Sciences. Choose wrong and you either forfeit the discovery's value or fracture the institute's scientific identity and legitimacy.

Vindhya's materials lab has produced a patentable low-cost water-purification membrane with clear commercial promise. The institute is publicly funded, prestigious for basic science, and staffed by researchers whose identity centers on scholarship and publication, not business. Government stakeholders want visible economic impact and technology transfer; industry partners are circling; and a few star scientists are tempted to spin out a company. But the institution has weak commercialization infrastructure, unclear IP-sharing norms, and a faculty culture that views commercial work as a threat to scientific integrity and academic legitimacy.

You decide how a research institute in an emerging economy should commercialize a breakthrough discovery without eroding its scientific identity.

The decision

How should Vindhya commercialize the membrane technology?

  • A - License outright to industry
  • B - Back a faculty spinout
  • C - Build transfer capability with norms

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →