Eureka Case 25 min Undergrad

The Phantom Cash Account

You are Inés Bravo, audit senior on the Láctea del Plata engagement, a multinational dairy company controlled by the founding family and listed in Buenos Aires. You're auditing the "easiest" line item of all: treasury. And that's exactly where something starts to smell wrong.

The situation

Láctea's balance sheet reports US$1.8 billion in an offshore account. The bank confirmation backing that balance arrives perfect, sealed and signed… but through the client's internal mail, not directly from the bank. The CFO tells you, smiling: "There you go, all confirmed, we can close treasury today."

Two things bother you. First: if Láctea has US$1.8 billion in cash, why does it keep borrowing at 7%, a debt load that also keeps growing year after year? Second: the interest earned on that giant cash pile is ridiculously low. It's the exact pattern of Parmalat, where a €4 billion account at Bank of America simply didn't exist, and the auditors accepted a fake confirmation.

Your job in this case: apply professional skepticism. Read the data, quantify why the cash "doesn't breathe," and decide which audit procedure to run. The confirmation is signed. The question is whether that's enough.

The decision

Which procedure do you run?

  • A · Accept the signed confirmation
  • B · Independent confirmation direct to the bank
  • C · Expand procedures + forensics + reassess integrity

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →