Eureka Case 25 min Finance

Sixty Basis Points

You are Sanne Doornbos, twelve days into the job as portfolio manager of Meridiaan Asset Management's €2.4 billion European equity fund in Amsterdam. Your largest client has given you ninety days, and before you touch the portfolio you must say what is actually wrong with the fund.

The situation

It is Monday, 12 January 2026. Two letters arrived overnight. A fund-research house whose ratings drive most of Meridiaan's platform sales has downgraded the fund for three years of underperformance and for "ESG positioning inconsistent with its marketing". Joost Klerken, chief investment officer of the pension fund that is your largest client, wants a fossil-free strategy classified under Article 9 of the EU sustainable-finance disclosure rules and the performance gap closed, both within ninety days. Otherwise the pension fund will redeem €640 million and buy an index-plus-ESG product at about 0.20% a year.

The fund is Meridiaan's flagship, benchmarked to MSCI Europe and sold for a decade as "active skill, responsibly applied". It charges 0.85% a year. Over three years it has trailed the index by 60 basis points a year after fees, with a tracking error of 2.1%, low for an active fund. Net flows have been negative for two quarters, −€180 million in the last one. The board chose you over an outside candidate on the argument that a screened active book can still beat its index.

Everyone on the floor has an explanation. Bram Osinga's quantitative desk wants to tilt the book towards the sectors and managers with the best recent returns; the same desk's back-test shows that kind of performance persisting weakly and often reversing after costs. Nadia El Amrani, the responsible-investment analyst, has costed the screens Klerken wants: a full Article 9 book would remove about 22% of the index by value. Pieter Sluis, in compliance, insists that whatever the fund screens, its factsheet must never claim more than the holdings support.

Meridiaan has never repriced a flagship. Your variable pay moves with three-year relative return and with client retention, and the €640 million is the largest single item in the second. You have four checkpoints, on days 1, 30, 60 and 90, and the first is today.

Your job in this case: look at where the 60 basis points come from, test how much of them a change in the portfolio could close, and name the dominant driver of the gap on day one: the diagnosis the next ninety days will be built on.

The decision

What is the dominant driver of the fund's 60-basis-point gap?

  • A · Stock selection: the wrong names were picked
  • B · Noise: three years is too short to judge
  • C · The fee: the price is larger than the edge

The rest of the case is locked

The data, the calculations, the decision itself and what happens next open with your institution's access code.

Have an access code?

No code yet?

Instructors can request access for a course. Tell us who you are and which course it is for, and we will send your institution a code.

Run it live in class: every student decides and justifies, and the whole class sees how it splits. How Eureka Case works →