Between round two and round three, the instructor opened a blank document and started typing. "Breaking news: oil prices spike, shipping costs up 30%." It took twelve minutes to make it feel real. The students never knew. Now it takes twelve seconds.
We've shipped two AI features that address the two biggest time sinks in running a simulation: writing contextual content between rounds, and making sense of participant reflections before the debrief. Both build on the broader case for Leveraging AI and Business Simulations for Executive Education.
AI-Generated Round News: Context Without the Admin Work
At the end of each simulation round, the AI news feature generates a short, contextual news article based on what actually happened in that round. You can guide it with a prompt — "focus on a supply chain disruption" or "highlight the demand spike in the northern region" — or leave it to generate automatically from the simulation's data. Either way, the result lands in front of participants as a brief that reads like something from a real business news feed.
It sets the scene for the next decision without the instructor spending fifteen minutes authoring it. The feature supports multiple languages, so if your cohort works in English and you want the brief available in Spanish or Arabic as well, both versions can be produced in the same workflow without separate authoring.
One rule applies before anything goes out: the instructor reviews and approves. AI generates the draft; you decide what participants see. That review step is built into the workflow deliberately, because how that content lands in your classroom is still your call.
AI Progress Summaries: What Your Teams Are Actually Thinking
After each round, participants complete a short structured reflection — three questions covering their results, their reasoning, and what they'll do differently. Forty participants means forty responses to read before the debrief. The AI progress summary reads them all and produces a diagnostic for the instructor in under a minute.
That diagnostic shows which teams understood the dynamics and which are still attributing results to bad luck. It surfaces where there's disagreement within a team before that team has had to resolve it. You walk into the debrief knowing where to start the conversation — not discovering it twenty minutes in while the room loses energy.
Think of it as having a tireless assistant who reads everything and hands you a briefing note. You're still the one who decides what to do with it.
More Time for What Actually Matters
Writing contextual news content between rounds is valuable — but it's logistics, not pedagogy. Skimming forty reflection responses before a session is useful — but it's research, not facilitation. These two features handle both so that when you're in the room, you can focus entirely on what only you can do: reading the group, asking the right question at the right moment, knowing when to push and when to let the team find its own way.
That's the time these features give back. What you do with it is still yours to decide.
Want to see both features live?
Request a demo →
